Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal workers have until February 6 to decide whether to voluntarily leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be allowed to depart and be paid up until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment lawyer who represents federal workers as a large part of her practice, setiathome.berkeley.edu so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s deferred resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually don’t consider it so much an offer. I believe it’s a demand to resign with a vague pledge that, possibly, you could be kept in administrative leave status for forum.batman.gainedge.org as much as eight months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is since there appears to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a really misleading term to use in this situation. When you think of a buyout, there’s generally some sort of composed contract or a concrete offer to offer an advantage in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your suggestions, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is workout severe caution. There are no warranties consisted of in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for particular is that if you change your mind, the agency’s probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most mindful since leaving earlier than intended can have serious consequences, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a bargain for people who do not wish to return to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal employees that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, trademarketclassifieds.com then they have the choice to resign, and wiki.rolandradio.net this administration is extremely generously offering to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s created to get folks who work truly hard to resign. I believe it’s trying to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals’s eyes because there are no assurances. And clashofcryptos.trade these are people who like their job. They like the objective of the company. They work hard. And today, they’re facing really tough choices, specifically if they’re remote. I imply, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, visualchemy.gallery if you’re somebody who lives in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal difficulties simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be truthful, is so unprecedented that I think a lot of us are still attempting to figure out what to do with it. I’m unsure if the deal itself might be challengeable. I think the larger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists right now for OPM to order firms to offer this variety of people administrative leave. So I believe it is quite perhaps setting the stage for challenges due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually vastly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our website terms of use and approvals pages at www.npr.org for more info.

NPR records are produced on a rush due date by an NPR contractor. This text might not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and accessibility may differ. The reliable record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.