Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National in Relation to Alleged Plan to Steal Proprietary AI Technology

A.gov website belongs to a main federal government company in the United States.

Secure.gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// means you have actually securely connected to the.gov website. Share delicate details just on official, protected sites.

– About – The Attorney general of the United States
– Organizational Chart
– Budget & Performance
– History
– Privacy Program

– Press Releases
– Speeches
– Videos
– Photo Galleries
– Blogs
– Podcasts

– Guidance Documents
– Forms
– Publications
– Details for Victims in Large Cases
– Justice Manual
– Business and Contracts

– Why Justice?
– Benefits
– DOJ Vacancies
– Legal Careers at DOJ

Utilities

– About
– News
– Internships
– FOIA
– Contact
– Details for Journalists

– About – title=” About” About
– The Attorney general of the United States
– Organizational Chart
– Budget & Performance
– History
– Privacy Program

– title=” News” News
– Press Releases
– Speeches
– Videos
– Photo Galleries
– Blogs
– Podcasts

– title=” Guidance & Resources” Resources
– Guidance Documents
– Forms
– Publications
– Details for Victims in Large Cases
– Justice Manual
– Business and Contracts

– Employment
– Why Justice?
– Benefits
– DOJ Vacancies
– Legal Careers at DOJ

– Our Offices
– Find Aid
– Contact Us

Breadcrumb

1. Justice.gov
2. Office of
3. News
4. Press Releases
5. Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National In Relation To Alleged Plan To Steal Proprietary AI Technology

MENU News

– All News
– Blogs
– Photo Galleries
– Podcasts
– Press Releases
– Speeches
– Videos

Archived Press Releases

Archived News

Para Notícias en Español

Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National in Relation to Alleged Plan to Steal Proprietary AI Technology

– Facebook
– X.
– LinkedIn.
– Email

Note: it-viking.ch View the superseding indictment here.

A federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment today charging Linwei Ding, also understood as Leon Ding, 38, with seven counts of financial espionage and 7 counts of theft of trade tricks in connection with an alleged strategy to take from Google LLC (Google) proprietary details connected to AI technology.

Ding was initially arraigned in March 2024 on 4 counts of theft of trade secrets. The superseding indictment returned today explains seven categories of trade secrets taken by Ding and charges Ding with seven counts of financial espionage and seven counts of theft of trade secrets.

According to the superseding indictment, Google worked with Ding as a software engineer in 2019. Between roughly May 2022 and May 2023, Ding published more than 1,000 unique files containing Google confidential details from Google’s network to his personal Google Cloud account, including the trade tricks alleged in the superseding indictment.

While Ding was utilized by Google, he secretly affiliated himself with two People’s Republic of China (PRC)– based innovation business. Around June 2022, Ding remained in conversations to be the Chief Technology Officer for an early-stage innovation company based in the PRC. By May 2023, Ding had founded his own innovation business focused on AI and artificial intelligence in the PRC and was acting as the business’s CEO.

The superseding indictment declares that Ding intended to benefit the PRC federal government by taking trade tricks from Google. Ding allegedly stole technology connecting to the hardware facilities and software platform that allows Google’s supercomputing data center to train and serve big AI designs. The trade secrets contain detailed details about the architecture and performance of Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) chips and systems and Google’s Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) systems, the software that allows the chips to communicate and execute jobs, and the software that manages countless chips into a supercomputer capable of training and performing innovative AI workloads. The trade secrets also pertain to Google’s custom-designed SmartNIC, a type of network interface card utilized to boost Google’s GPU, high performance, and cloud networking items.

As declared, Ding circulated a PowerPoint presentation to workers of his innovation business citing PRC national policies motivating the advancement of the domestic AI market. He likewise created a PowerPoint presentation containing an application to a PRC skill program based in Shanghai. The superseding indictment explains how PRC-sponsored skill programs incentivize people taken part in research and development outside the PRC to transfer that understanding and research study to the PRC in exchange for salaries, research funds, lab space, or other rewards. Ding’s application for the skill program stated that his company’s product “will assist China to have computing power infrastructure capabilities that are on par with the international level.”

If founded guilty, Ding deals with an optimum penalty of ten years in jail and as much as a $250,000 fine for each trade-secret count and 15 years in jail and $5,000,000 fine for each economic-espionage count. A federal district court judge will identify any sentence after thinking about the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory aspects.

The FBI is investigating the case.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Casey Boome and Molly K. Priedeman for users.atw.hu the Northern District of California and Trial Attorneys Stephen Marzen and photorum.eclat-mauve.fr Yifei Zheng of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.

Today’s action was collaborated through the Justice and Commerce Departments’ Disruptive Technology Strike Force. The Disruptive Technology Strike Force is an interagency police strike force co-led by the Departments of Justice and Commerce developed to target illicit stars, secure supply chains, and prevent important technology from being obtained by authoritarian regimes and hostile nation-states.

A superseding indictment is merely a claims. All defendants are presumed innocent until tested guilty beyond an affordable doubt in a court of law.