Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: employment Federal workers have up until February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be allowed to depart and be paid up until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work lawyer who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s deferred resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact do not consider it so much a deal. I think it’s a request to resign with an unclear promise that, possibly, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is because there appears to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately eight months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a very misleading term to use in this scenario. When you consider a buyout, there’s typically some sort of written agreement or a concrete offer to offer a benefit in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your guidance, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is workout severe care. There are no warranties included in this e-mail. The only thing I can inform you for particular is that if you alter your mind, the firm’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that might this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most cautious because leaving earlier than planned can have major repercussions, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who do not wish to go back to the office. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal employees that they need to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the choice to resign, and this administration is extremely kindly offering to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, employment that it’s designed to get folks who work actually tough to resign. I believe it’s attempting to pull the wool over a lot of people’s eyes since there are no warranties. And these are individuals who enjoy their job. They love the mission of the agency. They strive. And today, they’re dealing with very difficult options, particularly if they’re remote. I imply, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal obstacles just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be honest, is so extraordinary that I believe a great deal of us are still trying to determine what to do with it. I’m not sure if the deal itself might be . I think the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not mindful of any authority that exists right now for OPM to purchase agencies to give this number of people administrative leave. So I believe it is really much potentially setting the stage for obstacles since I feel OPM has greatly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our site terms of usage and approvals pages at www.npr.org for more info.

NPR transcripts are developed on a rush deadline by an NPR professional. This text might not be in its final kind and employment might be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might vary. The reliable record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.