Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have till February 6 to decide whether to voluntarily leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to take leave and be paid till completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment attorney who represents federal employees as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact do not consider it a lot a deal. I think it’s a demand to resign with a vague promise that, possibly, you might be kept in administrative leave status for approximately 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have been the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there seems to be the offer of administrative leave for as much as eight months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a really misleading term to use in this situation. When you believe of a buyout, there’s typically some sort of composed agreement or a concrete deal to supply an advantage in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your guidance, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is exercise extreme caution. There are no guarantees consisted of in this email. The only thing I can tell you for specific is that if you alter your mind, the agency’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some category of staff member who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful since leaving earlier than intended can have major repercussions, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who do not wish to go back to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a tip to federal workers that they have to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is very generously using to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work truly difficult to resign. I think it’s trying to pull the wool over a lot of individuals’s eyes since there are no warranties. And these are individuals who love their task. They love the objective of the company. They strive. And today, they’re facing really difficult options, particularly if they’re remote. I imply, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who resides in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal challenges just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be truthful, is so extraordinary that I think a great deal of us are still trying to find out what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the deal itself might be challengeable. I believe the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists right now for OPM to purchase agencies to give this number of people administrative leave. So I think it is very much possibly setting the phase for employment challenges due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually significantly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our site regards to usage and approvals pages at www.npr.org for more info.

NPR records are produced on a rush due date by an NPR professional. This text might not remain in its last form and might be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and schedule might vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.